Florence Foster-Jenkins (2016) review - Movie Thoughts (Chapter 31) π
Hello everyone,
Today's film was one of those ones where you don't love it, but you also don't hate it. It ends up sitting right in the middle of the spectrum of likeability. I hate writing reviews for films when I feel like that because it feels completely indecisive, even though my decision is middle of the road. Ranting or raving are instinctively easy, but these types of experiences and writing challenges are great for exercising my brain. I hope what came out this time made some type of sense to you....
(**disclaimer: the
following thoughts are 100% my opinion, you do not have to agree with them -
film is inherently subjective and everyone's perspective is valid! Also, there
are probably spoilers in the following, read at your own risk. Now onto some
thoughts....**)
![]() |
Source: IMDB |
Within the
growing array of dramedy biopics came a heartwarming and memorable story of a formidable
woman whose legacy was truly one of a kind. During the 1940's in New York City, socialite
Florence Foster-Jenkins (Meryl Streep) dreams of becoming an opera singer despite
the reality of her terrible singing voice. Devoted husband/manager St. Clair
Bayfield (Hugh Grant) goes to extreme lengths to make sure the faΓ§ade of her talent,
but faces his toughest challenge when she decides to perform a concert at the great
Carnegie Hall. Experienced director Stephen Frears was a pair of safe hands for
this narrative which explored both the whimsical rollercoaster of a singer who
can’t sing and the subconscious emotional issues intertwined within. There was
an innate sweetness and kindness that informed the warm tone Frears adopted to
construct every aspect of this story.
Aside from
the standard ‘so bad it’s good’ wordplays that could be used to describe the
gravity of Florence’s voice, it would have been easy to slip into a mindset of
taking the piss out of a woman who never understood how bad her vocals were. But
there isn’t a whiff of satire or ridicule in Frears’ direction or Nicholas
Martin’s heartwarming screenplay; instead grounding its emotional power in the
enigmatic energy of who Florence was and the touching preposterousness of her
story that initially drew Frears to the story.
Martin’s
screenplay stayed faithful to the truth and possessed a nuanced balance between
reality and the facade of a fantasy that Bayfield had meticulously crafted for
his beloved wife. The heartbreaking exhaustion of constantly keeping up
appearances until eventually the bubble burst ultimately humanized the legend of Jenkins’ legacy.
This film had
a captivating thematic voice, with multiple ideas working in tandem with one
another to grab hold of audiences’ heartstrings and never let go. The hustle
and bustle of wartime New York and Florence’s consistent flashes of reflection
on the boys fighting for the nation’s freedom evoked a strong sense of society
manifesting joy during a time of mass casualties and sacrifice. But at its core,
there was something sad and melancholic underneath the bright lights and fabulous
outfits.
This was also
an inspiring and beautiful exploration of living with serious illness. It was
revealed early that Florence was sick with syphilis; a devastating gift from
her first husband on their wedding night. A disease that had cost her most of
her life and stolen her ability to play the piano like an angel, it never stole
her love of music. That deep obsession gave Florence fifty more years on Earth
when her doctors predicted far fewer; and thus made the whole concept of her
desire to sing all the more heartbreaking. The applause and success from her
music was her oxygen. Some of the more eccentric and erratic behaviour was
simply the unpredictability of a dying woman; even carrying around her will in
a briefcase as an extension of her ever-present mortality. Watching her
struggle felt like heartbreak personified; and much of that connection was because
of Streep’s physical, all-consuming performance. Earning an Academy Award
nomination, she captured her unique charms beautifully whilst expertly crafting
a truly awful singing voice.
A surprisingly
profound degree of thematic depth also came in the complicated state of Florence
and Bayfield’s decades long marriage. Streep and Grant had wonderful chemistry
onscreen, and it was always clear that Bayfield was devoted to Florence. So much
so, he crafted a web of lies built on a payroll in order to make her dreams come
true – if that’s not true love, what is? Loyalty was a powerful thing, but the
notion of Bayfield hiding Florence’s true affinity to opera and more significantly
hiding younger girlfriend Kathleen (Rebecca Ferguson) in closets and golf trips
presented tough questions to ponder. A heartfelt resolution and a tearful
farewell, through it all Bayfield never laughed at her but loved and supported her
with a ferocity that was incredibly moving.
Grant’s refined
performance as Bayfield was earnest and captivating; and the journey of ambitious
pianist Cosme McMoon (Simon Helberg) was also lovely to watch as he fell into this
unique situation and was humbled by Florence’s spellbinding presence. Helberg nailed
the mannerisms and awkward pomp that define him, and a very shrill honest laugh
that popped out largely when he was alone. The combined skill and passion of
the three leads invigorated an already wonderful concept.
Frears’ Florence
Foster-Jenkins was a love letter to a heroic fighter physically weakened by
disease but thrived on a love of music and a tonedeaf devotion to singing. A
confident screenplay that cleverly tackled both the emotional turmoil and against
all odds success story, who knew watching someone sing so bad could look and
feel so good?.
7.5/10, 3
STARS
Thanks for reading,
Love and singing centre stage at Carnegie Hall in a gorgeous costume, Emily π
Comments
Post a Comment