The Nutcracker and the Four Realms (2018) review - Movie Thoughts (Chapter 45) 🎄
Hello everyone,
Today's film was a family Disney treat that slipped through the cracks for me when it first came out. I'm probably one of few people in the world who isn't a huge fan of The Nutcracker story, so I wasn't particularly excited about an adaptation of that; however the idea of Morgan Freeman, Dame Helen Mirren and Keira Knightley playing dress-up did intrigue me. So in my free time, I had a chance to watch it and it was fine. Not great, not terrible; just fine....
(**disclaimer: the
following thoughts are 100% my opinion, you do not have to agree with them -
film is inherently subjective and everyone's perspective is valid! Also, there
are probably spoilers in the following, read at your own risk. Now onto some
thoughts....**)
![]() |
Source: IMDB |
A whimsical
and surreal adaptation of a beloved Christmas tale, this re-imagination had memorable
visual spectacle but lacked consistency in a way that lost a spark or two by
the end credits. On Christmas Eve, Clara (Mackenzie Foy) discovers that her
mother left an inheritance of a magical land of fairies and live toy soldiers.
She soon learns she holds the key to the fate of the Four Realms in her hands.
Whilst Clara is an adventurous, fearless and largely likeable protagonist,
there was plenty of missteps happening around her and on-screen that left this
film with a lot to be desired.
Visually
saturated with colour and opulent detail, there was an aesthetic to large sequences
of this film that Tim Burton would have been very proud of. Guy Hendrix Dyas’ busy
production design had glitter, splendour and grand scope at its core, and a particular
focus on cogs, clockwork and mechanics that was hard to miss but not explored enough
in the dialogue or themes. Even if the narrative wasn’t working, it was always splendid
to look at with everything from the soldiers to the wallpaper being dialled up
to eleven. Costume designer Jenny Beavan and make-up/hair co-ordinator Jenny
Shircore delivered some beautiful and opulent designs; combining an exciting
vibrancy with a fantastical outrageousness that you would expect from a wonderous
fantasy land. One of the film’s highlights, the design work dressed everything up
with a brightness that was also reminiscent of the famous ballet’s visuals.
There was an
early attempt to darken the screen and the tone with an ominous first
introduction to the world and an ominous belief that ‘no-one escapes the Fourth
Realm’. With a creepy, haunted amusement park and frightening swarms of mice cloaked
in shadowy woods, there was an attempt to develop light and shade throughout, although
the presence of ‘dark’ elements fizzled out a little bit towards the end in
favour of more conventional villainy.
Not only was
the premise a popular seasonal cultural staple, but there were also speckles of
other pop culture references that added a degree of unexpected charm and cemented
its identity as another fairy-tale-esque fantasy adventure. How Clara was introduced
had roots in Alice in Wonderland’s title protagonist. Both Alice and Clara were
presented as intelligent and headstrong young women who felt like outcasts in
their society and didn’t like dresses very much. Foy’s Clara was a mechanical
genius, and her intellect was predictably cumbersome in the beginning but
helpful and later fully owned by Clara because of her ‘hero’s’ journey. Her
first step into the Realms was lifted straight out of the Chronicles of Narnia:
The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe with the darkened room in a big house and
a door that opened to a winter forest and a mysterious light; in this case an Xmas
tree. Clara even said ‘guess I’m not in London anymore’; referencing the original
girl discovering a new land, Dorothy and the twists and turns of Oz. These callbacks
were exciting to see in line with how co-directors Lasse Hallstrom and Joe
Johnston amped up the original concept of the Nutcracker story.
The James
Newton Howard score captured the magical, sparkly lightness of the ballet really
well and reinforced an implicit musicality at the story’s core. There were even
bits and pieces of the ballet music itself throughout, and audiences could pick
out the famous tunes and themes. There was even an extensive ballet sequence
built into the narrative to illustrate the origin story of the Four Realms. Featuring
an incredible dance performance by soloist Misty Copeland, adding this element was
gorgeous to watch on-screen if a little bit oddly shoe-horned in. The characters
of the ballet have obviously inspired the aesthetics of the Four Realms; the Land
of Snowflakes, the Land of Sweets, the Land of Flowers and the now exiled Land
of Amusements. Clever elevations of somewhat side characters and visuals in the
ballet through baking them into the world construction, but they didn’t have a
lot of depth outside of the reputation of the Amusement realm. Other obvious
cues like the Mouse king metamorphosed into a giant formation of live mice; but
their true nature were a distinct departure from the original source. Ever
quintessentially Russian, the palace was a spitting image of St Basil’s
Cathedral in Red Square as the prodigal princess returned. Audiences weren’t able
to forget what story they were being taken on whilst trying to follow the
events of the film premise within the context of the Realms.
Hallstrom and
Johnston didn’t do anything crazy, with simple and at times bland direction. Although
it did have visual sparkle, nothing about the film was arrestingly captivating.
There was too much exposition and not enough flow or charisma between characters
with the bulk of dialogue sitting with Sugar Plum (Keira Knightley), Clara and
Phillip (Jayden Fowora-Knight) whilst Mother Ginger (Helen Mirren) and toymaker
Drosselmeyer (Morgan Freeman) were lovely wall dressings in the sense that they
were really underused. Many of the action sequences were rather clunky, but
there were moments where a strong sense of peril was developed. Ashleigh Powell’s
screenplay and story was conceptually good, but thematically thin. Not much time
was given to anything else other than repairing Clara’s relationship with her
family and working through her grief over the loss of her beloved mother. Much of
the script and dialogue was bland, and Sugar Plum’s wit was largely very
cheesy. There was an overwhelming sense that it didn’t have much of a soul with
sincerity that never quite landed in a consistent sweet spot.
A talented ensemble
cast gave solid character-driven performances. Foy nailed the wide-eyed
maturity of Clara in the stand-out leading role. Fowora-Knight’s performance
also had great charm and his courage alongside some great quippy lines made for
a strong presence. Sugar Plum was not really a main character in the ballet, but
received a serious promotion to squeaky and crazy prominence. Knightley clearly
had the time of her life and her voice was distinctive but it all fell a bit
flat at times.
Much of this
film was charming and distinctively visual-heavy. Underneath was patchy and inconsistent
construction that ate away at some of its merit and lowered its quality. Much
like a sugar rush, this felt great but eventually lulled into a disappointing sort
of indifference.
7/10, 3 STARS
Thanks for reading,
Love and snowflakes, sweets, flowers and amusements, Emily 🎄
Comments
Post a Comment